Feb 18 2011
Understanding UK Distance Selling Regulations
I’ve recently been looking to purchase a piece of equipment online which is not available from big-name suppliers, only from a limited number lesser-known websites. Having no reputation upon which to base a purchasing decision, a viable method to choose between a reliable site and a potentially bad site could be to see how well each site’s Terms & Conditions comply with the legal requirements of the UK Distance Selling regulations – legal requirements which either seem to be frequently misunderstood by legitimate sellers or frequently mis-quoted by sellers who seemingly wish to shirk their responsibilities in an attempt to force unlawful terms onto unwitting customers.
For reference, the Office of Fair Trading‘s guide on distance selling is available in this PDF document.
Please note that these regulations only apply when goods are purchased remotely, without having viewed the goods prior to purchase. They in fact give consumers many more rights when making purchases via the internet than if they purchased from a shop – to the point where it in many cases no longer makes sense to purchase big-ticket items from a bricks-and-mortar shop at all!
To illustrate the issue raised above, let’s take a look at the Terms & Conditions of the first site I found selling the particular item I was interested in:
If you have simply changed your mind about any item ordered and you wish to return it, you can do so provided you inform us of your decision within 7 days of receipt. The item must not be used and must be ‘as new’ when returned to us. Once you’ve informed us that you wish to return goods, you have 14 calendar days to do so, at your own expense. Once the item is received, we refund by original payment method for unwanted items within seven days from receipt (items may be subject to a 15% restocking fee). Please note this policy has some limitations and does not apply to business customers (Distance Selling Regulations do not apply to at work customers or our Business customers).
The above is correct in so far as the DSRs, unless extended in the T&Cs, do apply for seven days from receipt of the item in question… but unfortunately this is where the compliance with the law of this passage ends.
Whilst the purchaser has a duty of care to try to maintain the condition of the purchased item, the seller is not allowed to insist upon the item being ‘as new’ and certainly not unused. Indeed, the seller must accept the item back in any condition, but may seek legal recourse if the item has been unreasonably ill-treated – although this does not remove from them the obligation to offer an immediate refund.
Once the purchaser has notified the seller that they wish to cancel their contract to purchase, the seller must offer a refund immediately: they have no legal recourse to withhold any refund until the goods are returned (and indeed if the goods aren’t returned, then the seller may only charge the purchaser for the direct cost of recovery – they cannot impose additional penalties).
The purchaser has no legally-defined time limit within which they must return the goods in order to receive a refund. The seller can certainly ask for the goods back within 14 days, but should make clear that breaching this request would not prevent a refund from being given in full.
The seller is allowed to specify that the cost of returning goods falls upon the purchaser.
As previously mentioned, the seller has no legal basis for awaiting the return of goods before offering a refund and is definitely not allowed under any circumstance to charge a restocking or administrative fee.
The distance selling regulations do indeed not apply to business customers, but the “at work customer” mentioned above has no legal definition and appears to be a term entirely of the author’s creation.
Let’s look at another:
Right to Cancel
9.1 You have a cooling off period of 14 days after the date on which you have received the Goods to cancel the Contract, and return the Goods at your cost and receive a full refund of the purchase price.
9.2 During the cooling off period any cancellation must be given by written notice by either party.
9.3 Goods must be returned complete and undamaged with all accessories and instructions. The original packing must be returned in reasonable condition.
9.4 <elided>
9.5 In the event that we supply substituted Goods to you in accordance with the provisions of Clause 2, your right to cancel is as set out as above except that the cost of returning the Goods shall be borne by us.
We’re off to a good start here – this retailer has decided to extend the mandatory seven day cooling-off period to fourteen days, and has clearly stated that the cost of returning the goods falls upon the purchaser: fine.
Requiring notification in writing (or at least by letter, fax, or email – a telephone call is not sufficient) is also correct.
Unfortunately, we hit a snag with item 9.3: Whilst the seller can ask that a purchaser return the packaging, they are unable to insist upon this.
Likewise whilst the purchaser has a statutory duty to take reasonable care of the goods, a blanket requirement of the goods being undamaged cannot be enforced.
Not bad, but still misleading in this important respect…
Finally we have a third site which specifies, in its entirety:
You have the right to cancel your purchase within seven days of purchase or seven days of receipt of the service purchased (whichever is the longer). Refunds will be made in full, upon receipt of the goods. To request a refund please email us at:-
support@<elided>
stating your details and the item(s) purchased and when they were purchased. Refunds will be made to the credit or debit card you purchased from.
… which cannot be accused of being either inaccurate or needlessly verbose!
Legally, the seller may not await receipt of the returned goods before issuing a refund – but this in a real-world context, it may be difficult to argue this point.
Note that the important thing to note here is that, since these Terms and Conditions do not specify that the purchaser is responsible for the cost of returning goods declined under the DSRs, this cost must be borne by the seller.
So there we have it – it’s well worth familiarising yourself with your legal rights when purchasing items online, as sellers large and small seem to be willing to try to hoodwink unwary customers into accepting at face-value unlawful contracts when purchasing goods at a distance.
More to the point, if you decide not to make a purchase from a website because they have a returns policy which does not adhere to the requirements of the Distance Selling Regulations, then contact the company in question and let them know that they have lost a sale for this very reason!
Stuart
18th February 2011 @ 12:50 am
To the contact address of the first site mentioned, I have sent this message:
I am writing to let you know that I have decided not to place an order with yourselves due to the fact that your Returns Policy is at odds with the UK Distance Selling Regulations, and therefore unlawful. Where a customer has changed their mind over a purchase and informed you within seven days:
* You may not insist that returned goods are unused or as-new;
* You must process the refund immediately rather than awaiting the returned goods to arrive;
* Whilst you may request that goods be returned within a certain period of notification of cancellation, you must make clear that failing to return the goods within this period will not prevent a full refund being offered;
* You may not legally take any fee or administrative charge away from the value refunded.
Additionally:
* an “at work customer” has no legal meaning and is not defined elsewhere on the page;
* the link (from this page) to your full Terms & Conditions is a dead-link.
For guidance on Distance Selling Regulations, see the OTF’s Guide for Businesses at http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/general/oft698.pdf
Dayve W
20th October 2011 @ 1:34 pm
Great stuff,
It’s a shame that the DSR don’t apply to businesses. There are a great many ‘one-man-bands’ out there, who are, effectively, a consumer. We have to take the risk unfortunately.
Darren
22nd August 2012 @ 5:01 pm
Hi Stuart,
Great post, it has really helped me in a situation I’m currently in.
I got these two replies to my immediate request for a refund (spelling/grammar is all theirs!):
—
Dear customer,
Thank you for your e-mail.
I have looked into your query and can confirm that we can only accept goods abck which have not been opened or used.
The goods will have to be returned at your own cost and if replacements are not required then a restocking fee may be applicable.
Please confirm if you would still like to return the items and please also confirm the reason for your return so that we can raise the relevant return documents at our offices.
I apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Kind Regards ()
—
Upon confirming that yes, I still do require a refund, I got this 2nd response…
—
Dear () Thank you for your email. As the item has been opened we would not able to accept this back. The website gives information on the product to see if this is suitable or not. I am sorry but it is procedures which we do have to folllow. I do apologies for the inconvenience caused to you. Kind regards ()
—
So as you can see, I’m being COMPLETELY REFUSED a refund because THE PRODUCT WAS OPENED! I’m also expected to see the suitability of an item with just a small jpeg on their website. Absurd.
What I’d like to ask is: how can I get the OFT to help me? Is there a specific procedure I need to follow?
Thanks,
D.
Stuart
22nd August 2012 @ 7:59 pm
Hi Darren,
It’s both disappointing and frustrating to see UK sellers trying to avoid their legal responsibilities. All you can do is to stick to your guns, and point out the specific terms in the Distance Selling Act that they’re bound to adhere to.
If the item you’re trying to return was purchased with a Credit Card and cost more than £100 then you have additional protection – contact your Card provider, send them your correspondence with the company in question (pointing out their non-compliance with UK law), and claim a refund from the card provider. It then becomes their problem rather than yours.
If you didn’t use a Credit Card or the value was less than £100 and the company won’t play ball, then your only options are the Office of Fair Trading/Trading Standards and, if it comes down to it, the small claims court. Unless the item in question cost thousands of pounds, though, the SCC is unlikely to be an economic option.
Your best bet is to directly quote the relevant passages from the DSRs to address their specific points, pointing out plainly that these are not optional – they are UK law.
Hope this helps – and please let me know how you get on!
All the best,
Stuart
Darren
23rd August 2012 @ 1:43 pm
Thanks for your help Stuart, much appreciated.
They’ve gone quiet today since I replied yesterday explaining how their contract and terms are unlawful.
Would you say that the OFT aren’t that useful in these situations? I was under the impression that they were quite powerful.
Best,
Darren.
Michael Lever
4th January 2013 @ 8:35 am
I find your comments useful. I am a professional adviser providing a service to which the dsr do not apply, also my website is non-transactional. Also my terms of engagement differ from dsr requirements. However I am inspired to add a section to my website explaining to potential clients rights and what they would/could be letting themselves in for if they instruct me to act for them. Within my field it’s possible that the client ps could be substantially out of pocket if the outcome is not in their favour through no fault of mine.
One point that I encounter when cancelling an order is that the seller invariably wants a reason for the cancellation. It’s not necessary for the purchaser to give a reason ( when the goods are not faulty) and it may be bearing that in mind.
Dolores Mulkerrins
14th January 2013 @ 8:19 pm
I purchased a dual chamber topper from John Lewis online and when i discovered it was not possible to separate the layers emailed them to return it and they said their policy was not to allow returns on mattresses and bedding. However the page I purchased it shows a delivery and returns and when I clicked on that got this:
I followed up my original request for a refund with a reminder of DSR and got an automated reply stating they were busy and would get back in 48 hours. I followed that with another reminder and request as I want the money back to buy the one I want from another supplier before it goes up to full price and got another automated response stating the 48 hour policy. I’m disgusted with them as they trade on their customer relations and service reputation.
Stuart
14th January 2013 @ 11:30 pm
Hi Dolores,
This initially looks like one of those unfortunate grey areas – the key section in the DSR PDF, above, is 3.38:
Sara Dewhurst
1st February 2013 @ 3:22 pm
Dear Stuart,
I bought a Siemens induction hob by telephone from a company called Hispek on 2nd Jan which was delivered on 16 Jan. On 19th Jan I sent them an email stating that I needed to return the item as it could not be installed in my kitchen.
They have said it will be subject to a 30% restocking fee. When I questioned their right to do this under the distance selling regulations I was told that because I didn’t quote the regulations in my email and did not say that I was returning them under this legislation then I wasn’t covered by it.
I have been advised that they are potentially acting illegally by doing this. I have also read the relevant section of the legislation which states that
” a notice of cancellation is a notice in writing or in another durable medium available and accessible to the supplier (or to the other person to whom it is given) which, however expressed, indicates the intention of the consumer to cancel the contract.”
In my email I used the words ‘I need to return the hob to you’ and I explained why I did not want it.
In your opinion does this indicate that I wish to cancel the contract? I think that they are going to say that I did not specifically use the word contract or cancel and therefore did not cancel the contract until after the 7 day cooling off period. However, they replied to my email on 21 Jan and seemed to understand that I didn’t want it anymore!
They also want to charge me over £50 for its return, a service I can buy from TNT for £8.49 +VAT.
If they refuse to give me my money back in full, what can I do? Should I send the hob back now, before they insist on collecting it at an extortionate price?
Your advice would be greatly appreciated!
Sara
Stuart
1st February 2013 @ 9:35 pm
Hi Sara,
Clearly, you’re dealing with a company not to be trusted, and who are trying to fob you off. Of course, if you are returning an item and requesting a full refund then whether you cite the DSRs or not you still have the full protection of the law. I would suggest that you immediately:
I once had to involve Trading Standards when I attempted to return an item which I stated was Not Fit For Purpose (a concept from the Sale of Goods Act) and therefore I requested a full refund under the Distance Selling Regulations. The company refused, and when Trading Standards became involved the company claimed they were handling the term under the SoG rather than DSR regulations. Clearly they have no grounds for this (and the case was eventually settled to my satisfaction) – but it just goes to show that it’s dangerous to give a dishonest organisation any leeway.
You’re actually perfectly legally entitled to inform the company that you wish to receive a full refund whilst retaining the goods in question, so long as you maintain your duty of care. Technically, even accidental damage doesn’t in any way affect your right to a complete refund – although I suspect that this would be a difficult situation to resolve in real life.
Finally, bear in mind that unless the company has explicitly stated in their terms and conditions that you are liable for the cost of return shipping or collection then you’re allowed to temporarily hold onto the goods, receive a refund, and not under any obligation to contribute a penny towards returns costs!