Life Thoughts

Understanding UK Distance Selling Regulations

I’ve recently been looking to purchase a piece of equipment online which is not available from big-name suppliers, only from a limited number lesser-known websites. Having no reputation upon which to base a purchasing decision, a viable method to choose between a reliable site and a potentially bad site could be to see how well each site’s Terms & Conditions comply with the legal requirements of the UK Distance Selling regulations – legal requirements which either seem to be frequently misunderstood by legitimate sellers or frequently mis-quoted by sellers who seemingly wish to shirk their responsibilities in an attempt to force unlawful terms onto unwitting customers.

For reference, the Office of Fair Trading‘s guide on distance selling is available in this PDF document.

Please note that these regulations only apply when goods are purchased remotely, without having viewed the goods prior to purchase. They in fact give consumers many more rights when making purchases via the internet than if they purchased from a shop – to the point where it in many cases no longer makes sense to purchase big-ticket items from a bricks-and-mortar shop at all!

To illustrate the issue raised above, let’s take a look at the Terms & Conditions of the first site I found selling the particular item I was interested in:

If you have simply changed your mind about any item ordered and you wish to return it, you can do so provided you inform us of your decision within 7 days of receipt. The item must not be used and must be ‘as new’ when returned to us. Once you’ve informed us that you wish to return goods, you have 14 calendar days to do so, at your own expense. Once the item is received, we refund by original payment method for unwanted items within seven days from receipt (items may be subject to a 15% restocking fee). Please note this policy has some limitations and does not apply to business customers (Distance Selling Regulations do not apply to at work customers or our Business customers).

The above is correct in so far as the DSRs, unless extended in the T&Cs, do apply for seven days from receipt of the item in question… but unfortunately this is where the compliance with the law of this passage ends.

Whilst the purchaser has a duty of care to try to maintain the condition of the purchased item, the seller is not allowed to insist upon the item being ‘as new’ and certainly not unused. Indeed, the seller must accept the item back in any condition, but may seek legal recourse if the item has been unreasonably ill-treated – although this does not remove from them the obligation to offer an immediate refund.

Once the purchaser has notified the seller that they wish to cancel their contract to purchase, the seller must offer a refund immediately: they have no legal recourse to withhold any refund until the goods are returned (and indeed if the goods aren’t returned, then the seller may only charge the purchaser for the direct cost of recovery – they cannot impose additional penalties).

The purchaser has no legally-defined time limit within which they must return the goods in order to receive a refund. The seller can certainly ask for the goods back within 14 days, but should make clear that breaching this request would not prevent a refund from being given in full.

The seller is allowed to specify that the cost of returning goods falls upon the purchaser.

As previously mentioned, the seller has no legal basis for awaiting the return of goods before offering a refund and is definitely not allowed under any circumstance to charge a restocking or administrative fee.

The distance selling regulations do indeed not apply to business customers, but the “at work customer” mentioned above has no legal definition and appears to be a term entirely of the author’s creation.

Let’s look at another:

Right to Cancel

9.1 You have a cooling off period of 14 days after the date on which you have received the Goods to cancel the Contract, and return the Goods at your cost and receive a full refund of the purchase price.

9.2 During the cooling off period any cancellation must be given by written notice by either party.

9.3 Goods must be returned complete and undamaged with all accessories and instructions. The original packing must be returned in reasonable condition.

9.4 <elided>

9.5 In the event that we supply substituted Goods to you in accordance with the provisions of Clause 2, your right to cancel is as set out as above except that the cost of returning the Goods shall be borne by us.

We’re off to a good start here – this retailer has decided to extend the mandatory seven day cooling-off period to fourteen days, and has clearly stated that the cost of returning the goods falls upon the purchaser: fine.

Requiring notification in writing (or at least by letter, fax, or email – a telephone call is not sufficient) is also correct.

Unfortunately, we hit a snag with item 9.3: Whilst the seller can ask that a purchaser return the packaging, they are unable to insist upon this.

Likewise whilst the purchaser has a statutory duty to take reasonable care of the goods, a blanket requirement of the goods being undamaged cannot be enforced.

Not bad, but still misleading in this important respect…

Finally we have a third site which specifies, in its entirety:

You have the right to cancel your purchase within seven days of purchase or seven days of receipt of the service purchased (whichever is the longer). Refunds will be made in full, upon receipt of the goods. To request a refund please email us at:-


stating your details and the item(s) purchased and when they were purchased. Refunds will be made to the credit or debit card you purchased from.

… which cannot be accused of being either inaccurate or needlessly verbose!

Legally, the seller may not await receipt of the returned goods before issuing a refund – but this in a real-world context, it may be difficult to argue this point.

Note that the important thing to note here is that, since these Terms and Conditions do not specify that the purchaser is responsible for the cost of returning goods declined under the DSRs, this cost must be borne by the seller.

So there we have it – it’s well worth familiarising yourself with your legal rights when purchasing items online, as sellers large and small seem to be willing to try to hoodwink unwary customers into accepting at face-value unlawful contracts when purchasing goods at a distance.

More to the point, if you decide not to make a purchase from a website because they have a returns policy which does not adhere to the requirements of the Distance Selling Regulations, then contact the company in question and let them know that they have lost a sale for this very reason!

16 replies on “Understanding UK Distance Selling Regulations”

… it actually looks as if the company’s T&C are actually reasonably compliant:

  1. If goods have been dispatched and you subsequently cancel your order, under the Distance Selling Regulations as part of our Terms & Conditions you must take reasonable care of the goods. It will be your responsibility to return these goods to The Company at St Albans at your cost (See our Refund & Exchange Policy – Clause 23).

So if you want to return the item by £8.95 courier then they explicitly allow this.

  1. Any order deemed to be ordered incorrectly will be subjected to a 30% restocking fee if the boxes have been opened, for products unopened a charge of 10% applies. There will also be a charge to return the item to us depending on the product type and method of collection. This does not apply under the terms of DSR.

… e.g. if you made a B2B purchase from them, there’s a 30% fee. But the DSRs don’t allow that so, as a consumer, this clause is meaningless.

  1. The Company will not accept goods returned that are found not to be faulty or because the customer does not require them. This includes all mail order & Internet transactions that fall outside ‘The Distance Selling Regulations’.” Under the ‘Distance Selling Regulations’ you have a seven day cooling off period.

All consumer transactions are covered under the DSRs, so this just confirms that, since you contacted the company four days into your seven-day cooling-off period, you have the full protection of the law behind you.

It just goes to show – there are many companies out there whose T&C are blatantly unenforceable in the UK. Here’s a case where the terms are generally along the right lines – but whether they plan to honour them is apparently a different question.

Dear Stuart,

I have just suffered the same experience as Dolores relating to the online purchase of a mattress topper (cost £79) from Memory Foam Warehouse which arrived yesterday. My Wife unpacked it and inspected it to find the topper to be of inferior quality than expected compared to those seen in local retailers. She re-wrapped it in the same packaging for return and I telephoned the company this morning.

I was told it could be returned for a cost of £45 BUT only if it had been left undisturbed in the original packaging ;any goods unwrapped would be deemed to have been used and for health and safety reasons they would not be able to cancel the contract or make any refund. I was advised to email customer services which I did receiving a reply quoting their terms and conditions which basically stated what I had been told on the telephone.

I replied drawing their attention to sections 3.41 to 3.44 of the Office of Fair Trading document suggesting that their terms and conditions appeared to conflict with the regulations. They replied requoting their terms and conditions and as such would not consider any refund. No comment was made about the relevant sections of the OFT document.

What to do next, I wonder?

Hi Chris,

It sounds as if you’ve gone exactly the right thing so far. As ever, the key section is section 3.42. To re-cap the above information:

We are conscious of concerns about reselling items which may raise concerns about hygiene. However, the DSRs do not link cancellation rights with a supplier’s ability to resell items as new.

… which section 3.44 elaborates upon with:

It may be reasonable for the supplier to stipulate what they consider to be reasonable care, such as not removing hygiene seals on garments or only trying out shoes indoors. But these stipulations cannot restrict a consumer’s reasonable opportunity to inspect and assess the product. Consumers have the right to cancel even if they fail to take reasonable care of the goods;

However, a disreputable seller may still try to avoid its legal obligations. In this case, I’d suggest sending an email backed up by a letter sent by recorded post to their customer-services department, laying out your case, your knowledge of the Distance Selling Regulations, and your willingness to get Trading Standards involved if you feel that you are not being fairly treated. Ask for a written response within five working days. If this doesn’t have the desired effect, then contact Trading Standards and provide them with any details (such as email messages) where the seller has, in writing, failed to adhere to the Distance Selling Regulations. Armed with this information, Trading Standards should then be able to advise you on how best to proceed.

Good luck!

Hi Stuart,

I thought you might be interested to know that I wrote back to the Supplier on the lines you suggested and after two days I received a reply offering a full refund and collection of the goods without charge.

A successful result and I thank you very much for your good advice.



I’m very happy to have stumbled upon this posting.
In 2009 I purchased 3x Solid State Disk Drives from OneStopPCShop online in the amount of £411. This was new technology at the time, and I either couldn’t get it to work with my PC or wasn’t happy with the performance (or both). I raised a return request which was accepted, and quickly returned the drives.

The seller then never gave a refund. They accepted the drives back, confirmed they had received them, but said they needed a 25% restocking fee, and would not refund my money.

Finally they stopped responding to my requests via email. I am now trying to follow this up again, and the seller has interestingly responded by saying he’s happy to send the same drives back to me, but will still not provide a refund.

I’m not native to the UK, nor understand the DSR regulations that well. I believe I’m well within my rights to demand and receive a full refund. How do I take this forward?

Leave a Reply